Welcome!

Log Management Authors: Dana Gardner, Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, David H Deans, Carmen Gonzalez

Blog Feed Post

Control, choice, and cost: The Conflict in the Cloud

One of the oft cited reasons in surveys that enterprises aren’t flocking to the cloud like lemmings off a cliff is “lack of control”. Problem is that articles and pundits quoting this reason never really define what that means.

After all, cloud providers appear to be cognizant of the need for users (IT) to be able to define thresholds, reserve instances, deploy a variety of “infrastructure”, and manage their cloud deployment themselves. The lack of control, however, is at least partially about control over the infrastructure itself and, perhaps, complicated by the shallow definition of “infrastructure” by cloud providers.

cloudcontrol Perusing the options available from Amazon can be overwhelming and yet underwhelming at the same time, depending on what you’re looking for. The list of operating systems and application environments that can be deployed is extensive, a veritable potpourii of options. But that’s where it ends – at the application infrastructure. If there’s an option for deploying or managing the rest of the supporting infrastructure I’ve yet to stumble across it. Load balancing. Acceleration. Optimization. Identity and Access Management. Security. Quality of Service. Rate Shaping. Compression. Secure remote access? Certificate management? LDAP? XML gateway? The list would grow quite extensive if you listed out all the components that go into a well-oiled network and application network infrastructure. You know, the infrastructure that’s necessary to deliver applications.

Suffice it to say this is where the shallow definition of infrastructure in the cloud meets lack of control and forces C-level executives to make a decision on which way to go: with the cloud or with control.

THE ARCHITECTURAL DESTINY of IT

When IT is tasked with delivering an application it must necessarily consider available, security, and performance of that application as it pertains to traversing the data center network. When applications perform poorly IT is tasked with addressing the issue in order to adhere to organizational service-level agreements. This is the reason so many solutions and options exist in the network and application network infrastructure: to provide the means by which IT can architect a well-performing, reliable, and secure environment in which applications can be delivered.

When the ability of IT to choose and deploy those integral pieces of the network and application network infrastructure they lose control over the delivery of that application. They no longer have the means by which they can deploy solutions designed to augment or enhance or fix issues commonly occurring with the deployment of applications. They lose control over their own architectural destiny, trusting implicitly in cloud providers to offer the choices necessary to the successful deployment and delivery of applications.

The shallow definition of “infrastructure” used today is impeding adoption of the cloud because users lack choices and options. They lack control over that environment in an architectural sense. It isn’t the turning over of the reins for management and maintenance that’s problematic; it’s the architectural control that’s lost that gives rise to these concerns.

CONTROL IMPLIES CHOICE

Cloud providers are doing the term “infrastructure” a disservice when they focus solely on the application infrastructure – databases, operating systems, web and application servers, server hardware – and ignore that a real infrastructure includes network and application infrastructure. And that without the ability to easily choose and deploy network and application-network focused services in the cloud that organizations are necessarily going to be leery of the ability to meet service-level agreements and improve performance and security levels in the cloud without the control they are typically afforded by a physical data center.

Increased capacity does not always result in improved performance of applications. It is but one way in which solutions attempt to address the problem of application performance. In the cloud, this is the only way to address the problem, unless you’re using Amazon and are keen on adding yet another line-item to your monthly cloud provider bill by signing up for CloudFront. That’s certainly an option, but unfortunately for organizations it’s currently the only option for many in the cloud.

Cloud providers need to recognize the need for alternative solutions addressing performance and security in the cloud and offer their potential enterprise customers not only choice but control over those solutions. If providers are going to offer Infrastructure as a Service then they need to support more than just application infrastructure as a service. They need to broaden their support and inclusion of the same types of options available to the CTO and CIO in their own data center, which includes a much wider array of solutions than is currently available today.

THE PARADOX FOR CLOUD PROVIDERS

Dave Rosenberg of C|NET’s Negative Approach hit upon the reason for the reluctance we’re likely to continue seeing in the cloud around choice and control:

Disaster recovery, compliance, and enterprisey [sic] features are where the growth is in the near term. You have to have an SLA and support for true enterprise-class applications. Amazon will probably do this over time, but right now, you have no real option. Rowell pointed out that for Amazon to offer these services would add significantly overhead and likely cause the price point to rise significantly.

Cost. Right now cloud is selling, albeit slowly in the enterprise market, based on perceived initial and long term cost reductions. Offering choice and therefore the control necessary to implement the infrastructure necessary to ensure compliance with SLAs and “true enterprise-class applications” would require additional investments by cloud providers that would most certainly be passed on to the customer by way of price increases. Increasing the cost of cloud computing would certainly decrease its already lackluster appeal to many enterprises, thus effectively shooting providers in their own feet.

It’s a Catch-22 situation; giving control to customers would make it more appealing technically but less appealing from a financial perspective. This means cloud providers are going to need to evaluate options that keep the costs down while affording enterprise markets the control and choice they need to adopt cloud computing as a viable alternative to in-house data centers.

HOW INFRASTRUCTURE 2.0 CAN HELP

Vendors already understand the evolutionary need for a more dynamic infrastructure that addresses the issues cropping up with cloud and virtualization and emerging data center models. Hence the drive toward Infrastructure 2.0. In addition to its core capabilities around connectivity intelligence (collaboration), elasticity, and intelligence is elasticity.

That elasticity needs to expand beyond the traditional view of “capacity on demand” and include “management on demand”. Support for multi-tenant environments like cloud computing and virtualized architectures is a must. Coupled with a flexible architecture and collaborative intelligence, multi-tenancy allows providers the ability to deploy new functionality “on-demand” on existing infrastructure platforms and extend the ability to control that new functionality to customers in an isolated management structure.

By enabling cloud providers to extend the functionality of existing investments to include many of the solution choices enterprises would normally make in the course of deploying applications and their supporting infrastructure, they can remove “lack of control” and “limited choice” from the list of reasons why an organization rejects cloud computing as an option while ensuring that the “cost” borne by the provider is significantly reduced, thus making it a feasible option to offer these options to customers who may require it.

Providers will, of course, charge for such options but if the investment is not so heavy a burden on the part of the provider then the cost passed on to the organization will certainly be (or at least certainly can be) lessened to the point it is comparable to the investment the enterprise would make internally.

 

Follow me on Twitter View Lori's profile on SlideShare friendfeedicon_facebook AddThis Feed Button Bookmark and Share

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Read the original blog entry...

More Stories By Lori MacVittie

Lori MacVittie is responsible for education and evangelism of application services available across F5’s entire product suite. Her role includes authorship of technical materials and participation in a number of community-based forums and industry standards organizations, among other efforts. MacVittie has extensive programming experience as an application architect, as well as network and systems development and administration expertise. Prior to joining F5, MacVittie was an award-winning Senior Technology Editor at Network Computing Magazine, where she conducted product research and evaluation focused on integration with application and network architectures, and authored articles on a variety of topics aimed at IT professionals. Her most recent area of focus included SOA-related products and architectures. She holds a B.S. in Information and Computing Science from the University of Wisconsin at Green Bay, and an M.S. in Computer Science from Nova Southeastern University.

IoT & Smart Cities Stories
Bill Schmarzo, author of "Big Data: Understanding How Data Powers Big Business" and "Big Data MBA: Driving Business Strategies with Data Science," is responsible for setting the strategy and defining the Big Data service offerings and capabilities for EMC Global Services Big Data Practice. As the CTO for the Big Data Practice, he is responsible for working with organizations to help them identify where and how to start their big data journeys. He's written several white papers, is an avid blogge...
Nicolas Fierro is CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions. He is a programmer, technologist, and operations dev who has worked with Ethereum and blockchain since 2014. His knowledge in blockchain dates to when he performed dev ops services to the Ethereum Foundation as one the privileged few developers to work with the original core team in Switzerland.
René Bostic is the Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America. Enjoying her career with IBM during the modern millennial technological era, she is an expert in cloud computing, DevOps and emerging cloud technologies such as Blockchain. Her strengths and core competencies include a proven record of accomplishments in consensus building at all levels to assess, plan, and implement enterprise and cloud computing solutions. René is a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and a m...
Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settlement products to hedge funds and investment banks. After, he co-founded a revenue cycle management company where he learned about Bitcoin and eventually Ethereal. Andrew's role at ConsenSys Enterprise is a mul...
In his general session at 19th Cloud Expo, Manish Dixit, VP of Product and Engineering at Dice, discussed how Dice leverages data insights and tools to help both tech professionals and recruiters better understand how skills relate to each other and which skills are in high demand using interactive visualizations and salary indicator tools to maximize earning potential. Manish Dixit is VP of Product and Engineering at Dice. As the leader of the Product, Engineering and Data Sciences team at D...
Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...
Whenever a new technology hits the high points of hype, everyone starts talking about it like it will solve all their business problems. Blockchain is one of those technologies. According to Gartner's latest report on the hype cycle of emerging technologies, blockchain has just passed the peak of their hype cycle curve. If you read the news articles about it, one would think it has taken over the technology world. No disruptive technology is without its challenges and potential impediments t...
If a machine can invent, does this mean the end of the patent system as we know it? The patent system, both in the US and Europe, allows companies to protect their inventions and helps foster innovation. However, Artificial Intelligence (AI) could be set to disrupt the patent system as we know it. This talk will examine how AI may change the patent landscape in the years to come. Furthermore, ways in which companies can best protect their AI related inventions will be examined from both a US and...
Bill Schmarzo, Tech Chair of "Big Data | Analytics" of upcoming CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO New York (November 12-13, 2018, New York City) today announced the outline and schedule of the track. "The track has been designed in experience/degree order," said Schmarzo. "So, that folks who attend the entire track can leave the conference with some of the skills necessary to get their work done when they get back to their offices. It actually ties back to some work that I'm doing at the University of San...
When talking IoT we often focus on the devices, the sensors, the hardware itself. The new smart appliances, the new smart or self-driving cars (which are amalgamations of many ‘things'). When we are looking at the world of IoT, we should take a step back, look at the big picture. What value are these devices providing. IoT is not about the devices, its about the data consumed and generated. The devices are tools, mechanisms, conduits. This paper discusses the considerations when dealing with the...