Log Management Authors: Dana Gardner, Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, David H Deans, Carmen Gonzalez

Blog Feed Post

Control, choice, and cost: The Conflict in the Cloud

One of the oft cited reasons in surveys that enterprises aren’t flocking to the cloud like lemmings off a cliff is “lack of control”. Problem is that articles and pundits quoting this reason never really define what that means.

After all, cloud providers appear to be cognizant of the need for users (IT) to be able to define thresholds, reserve instances, deploy a variety of “infrastructure”, and manage their cloud deployment themselves. The lack of control, however, is at least partially about control over the infrastructure itself and, perhaps, complicated by the shallow definition of “infrastructure” by cloud providers.

cloudcontrol Perusing the options available from Amazon can be overwhelming and yet underwhelming at the same time, depending on what you’re looking for. The list of operating systems and application environments that can be deployed is extensive, a veritable potpourii of options. But that’s where it ends – at the application infrastructure. If there’s an option for deploying or managing the rest of the supporting infrastructure I’ve yet to stumble across it. Load balancing. Acceleration. Optimization. Identity and Access Management. Security. Quality of Service. Rate Shaping. Compression. Secure remote access? Certificate management? LDAP? XML gateway? The list would grow quite extensive if you listed out all the components that go into a well-oiled network and application network infrastructure. You know, the infrastructure that’s necessary to deliver applications.

Suffice it to say this is where the shallow definition of infrastructure in the cloud meets lack of control and forces C-level executives to make a decision on which way to go: with the cloud or with control.


When IT is tasked with delivering an application it must necessarily consider available, security, and performance of that application as it pertains to traversing the data center network. When applications perform poorly IT is tasked with addressing the issue in order to adhere to organizational service-level agreements. This is the reason so many solutions and options exist in the network and application network infrastructure: to provide the means by which IT can architect a well-performing, reliable, and secure environment in which applications can be delivered.

When the ability of IT to choose and deploy those integral pieces of the network and application network infrastructure they lose control over the delivery of that application. They no longer have the means by which they can deploy solutions designed to augment or enhance or fix issues commonly occurring with the deployment of applications. They lose control over their own architectural destiny, trusting implicitly in cloud providers to offer the choices necessary to the successful deployment and delivery of applications.

The shallow definition of “infrastructure” used today is impeding adoption of the cloud because users lack choices and options. They lack control over that environment in an architectural sense. It isn’t the turning over of the reins for management and maintenance that’s problematic; it’s the architectural control that’s lost that gives rise to these concerns.


Cloud providers are doing the term “infrastructure” a disservice when they focus solely on the application infrastructure – databases, operating systems, web and application servers, server hardware – and ignore that a real infrastructure includes network and application infrastructure. And that without the ability to easily choose and deploy network and application-network focused services in the cloud that organizations are necessarily going to be leery of the ability to meet service-level agreements and improve performance and security levels in the cloud without the control they are typically afforded by a physical data center.

Increased capacity does not always result in improved performance of applications. It is but one way in which solutions attempt to address the problem of application performance. In the cloud, this is the only way to address the problem, unless you’re using Amazon and are keen on adding yet another line-item to your monthly cloud provider bill by signing up for CloudFront. That’s certainly an option, but unfortunately for organizations it’s currently the only option for many in the cloud.

Cloud providers need to recognize the need for alternative solutions addressing performance and security in the cloud and offer their potential enterprise customers not only choice but control over those solutions. If providers are going to offer Infrastructure as a Service then they need to support more than just application infrastructure as a service. They need to broaden their support and inclusion of the same types of options available to the CTO and CIO in their own data center, which includes a much wider array of solutions than is currently available today.


Dave Rosenberg of C|NET’s Negative Approach hit upon the reason for the reluctance we’re likely to continue seeing in the cloud around choice and control:

Disaster recovery, compliance, and enterprisey [sic] features are where the growth is in the near term. You have to have an SLA and support for true enterprise-class applications. Amazon will probably do this over time, but right now, you have no real option. Rowell pointed out that for Amazon to offer these services would add significantly overhead and likely cause the price point to rise significantly.

Cost. Right now cloud is selling, albeit slowly in the enterprise market, based on perceived initial and long term cost reductions. Offering choice and therefore the control necessary to implement the infrastructure necessary to ensure compliance with SLAs and “true enterprise-class applications” would require additional investments by cloud providers that would most certainly be passed on to the customer by way of price increases. Increasing the cost of cloud computing would certainly decrease its already lackluster appeal to many enterprises, thus effectively shooting providers in their own feet.

It’s a Catch-22 situation; giving control to customers would make it more appealing technically but less appealing from a financial perspective. This means cloud providers are going to need to evaluate options that keep the costs down while affording enterprise markets the control and choice they need to adopt cloud computing as a viable alternative to in-house data centers.


Vendors already understand the evolutionary need for a more dynamic infrastructure that addresses the issues cropping up with cloud and virtualization and emerging data center models. Hence the drive toward Infrastructure 2.0. In addition to its core capabilities around connectivity intelligence (collaboration), elasticity, and intelligence is elasticity.

That elasticity needs to expand beyond the traditional view of “capacity on demand” and include “management on demand”. Support for multi-tenant environments like cloud computing and virtualized architectures is a must. Coupled with a flexible architecture and collaborative intelligence, multi-tenancy allows providers the ability to deploy new functionality “on-demand” on existing infrastructure platforms and extend the ability to control that new functionality to customers in an isolated management structure.

By enabling cloud providers to extend the functionality of existing investments to include many of the solution choices enterprises would normally make in the course of deploying applications and their supporting infrastructure, they can remove “lack of control” and “limited choice” from the list of reasons why an organization rejects cloud computing as an option while ensuring that the “cost” borne by the provider is significantly reduced, thus making it a feasible option to offer these options to customers who may require it.

Providers will, of course, charge for such options but if the investment is not so heavy a burden on the part of the provider then the cost passed on to the organization will certainly be (or at least certainly can be) lessened to the point it is comparable to the investment the enterprise would make internally.


Follow me on Twitter View Lori's profile on SlideShare friendfeedicon_facebook AddThis Feed Button Bookmark and Share

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Read the original blog entry...

More Stories By Lori MacVittie

Lori MacVittie is responsible for education and evangelism of application services available across F5’s entire product suite. Her role includes authorship of technical materials and participation in a number of community-based forums and industry standards organizations, among other efforts. MacVittie has extensive programming experience as an application architect, as well as network and systems development and administration expertise. Prior to joining F5, MacVittie was an award-winning Senior Technology Editor at Network Computing Magazine, where she conducted product research and evaluation focused on integration with application and network architectures, and authored articles on a variety of topics aimed at IT professionals. Her most recent area of focus included SOA-related products and architectures. She holds a B.S. in Information and Computing Science from the University of Wisconsin at Green Bay, and an M.S. in Computer Science from Nova Southeastern University.

IoT & Smart Cities Stories
Digital Transformation and Disruption, Amazon Style - What You Can Learn. Chris Kocher is a co-founder of Grey Heron, a management and strategic marketing consulting firm. He has 25+ years in both strategic and hands-on operating experience helping executives and investors build revenues and shareholder value. He has consulted with over 130 companies on innovating with new business models, product strategies and monetization. Chris has held management positions at HP and Symantec in addition to ...
Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that Big Data Federation to Exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO, colocated with DevOpsSUMMIT and DXWorldEXPO, November 12-13, 2018 in New York City. Big Data Federation, Inc. develops and applies artificial intelligence to predict financial and economic events that matter. The company uncovers patterns and precise drivers of performance and outcomes with the aid of machine-learning algorithms, big data, and fundamental analysis. Their products are deployed...
All in Mobile is a place where we continually maximize their impact by fostering understanding, empathy, insights, creativity and joy. They believe that a truly useful and desirable mobile app doesn't need the brightest idea or the most advanced technology. A great product begins with understanding people. It's easy to think that customers will love your app, but can you justify it? They make sure your final app is something that users truly want and need. The only way to do this is by ...
The challenges of aggregating data from consumer-oriented devices, such as wearable technologies and smart thermostats, are fairly well-understood. However, there are a new set of challenges for IoT devices that generate megabytes or gigabytes of data per second. Certainly, the infrastructure will have to change, as those volumes of data will likely overwhelm the available bandwidth for aggregating the data into a central repository. Ochandarena discusses a whole new way to think about your next...
CloudEXPO | DevOpsSUMMIT | DXWorldEXPO are the world's most influential, independent events where Cloud Computing was coined and where technology buyers and vendors meet to experience and discuss the big picture of Digital Transformation and all of the strategies, tactics, and tools they need to realize their goals. Sponsors of DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO benefit from unmatched branding, profile building and lead generation opportunities.
Cell networks have the advantage of long-range communications, reaching an estimated 90% of the world. But cell networks such as 2G, 3G and LTE consume lots of power and were designed for connecting people. They are not optimized for low- or battery-powered devices or for IoT applications with infrequently transmitted data. Cell IoT modules that support narrow-band IoT and 4G cell networks will enable cell connectivity, device management, and app enablement for low-power wide-area network IoT. B...
The hierarchical architecture that distributes "compute" within the network specially at the edge can enable new services by harnessing emerging technologies. But Edge-Compute comes at increased cost that needs to be managed and potentially augmented by creative architecture solutions as there will always a catching-up with the capacity demands. Processing power in smartphones has enhanced YoY and there is increasingly spare compute capacity that can be potentially pooled. Uber has successfully ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that CrowdReviews.com has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5–7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. CrowdReviews.com is a transparent online platform for determining which products and services are the best based on the opinion of the crowd. The crowd consists of Internet users that have experienced products and services first-hand and have an interest in letting other potential buye...
When talking IoT we often focus on the devices, the sensors, the hardware itself. The new smart appliances, the new smart or self-driving cars (which are amalgamations of many ‘things'). When we are looking at the world of IoT, we should take a step back, look at the big picture. What value are these devices providing. IoT is not about the devices, its about the data consumed and generated. The devices are tools, mechanisms, conduits. This paper discusses the considerations when dealing with the...